Machine Men

Machine Men with Machine Minds & Machine Hearts

Use this to read the text : Binary To Text Conversion

1001001101000001011011000110110000100000011011100110111101110010011011010110000101101100001000000110110001101001011001100110010100101100001000000101000001100101011101000110010101110010001011000010000001100011011011110110111001110011011000110110100101101111011101010111001101101100011110010010000001101111011100100010000001101111011101000110100001100101011100100111011101101001011100110110010100101100001000000111001001100101011100110110010101101110011101000010000001100100011011110110110101101001011011100110000101110100011010010110111101101110001011100010000001001001011001100010000001110100011010000110010100100000011001000110111101101101011010010110111001100001011101000110100101101111011011100010000001101001011100110010000001100010011110010010000001100001011011100010000001101001011011100110011001100101011100100110100101101111011100100010110000100000011011110111001000100000011000100111100100100000011000010010000001110011011101010111000001110000011011110111001101100101011001000010000001101001011011100110011001100101011100100110100101101111011100100010110000100000011101000110100001100101001000000111001001100101011100110110010101101110011101000110110101100101011011100111010000100000011000100110010101100011011011110110110101100101011100110010000001110011011101000111001001101111011011100110011101100101011100100010111010010100001000000000110100001010001001100010001100111000001100100011000100110011001110110010000001001001011100110110000101100001011000110010000001000001011100110110100101101101011011110111011000101100001000000100100100101100001000000101001001101111011000100110111101110100

10010011010010010010110000100000011011110110111000100000011101000110100001100101001000000110111101110100011010000110010101110010001000000110100001100001011011100110010000101100001000000110000101101101001000000110000100100000011001100110100101101110011010010111001101101000011001010110010000100000011100000111001001101111011001000111010101100011011101000010111000100000010010010010000001100001011000100111001101101111011100100110001000100000011001010110110001100101011000110111010001110010011010010110001101100001011011000010000001100101011011100110010101110010011001110111100100100000011001000110100101110010011001010110001101110100011011000111100100100000011000010110111001100100001000000111010101110100011010010110110001101001011110100110010100100000011010010111010000100000011101110110100101110100011010000010000001100001011011100010000001100001011011000110110101101111011100110111010000100000011011110110111001100101001000000110100001110101011011100110010001110010011001010110010000100000011100000110010101110010011000110110010101101110011101000010000001100101011001100110011001101001011000110110100101100101011011100110001101111001001011100010000001001001001000000110000101101101001000000110001101101111011011010111000001101111011100110110010101100100001000000110111101100110001000000111001101110100011100100110111101101110011001110010000001101101011001010111010001100001011011000010110000100000011000010110110100100000011000110110111101101110011101000110100101101110011101010110111101110101011100110110110001111001001000000110001101101111011011100111001101100011011010010110111101110101011100110010110000100000011000010110111001100100001000000110001101100001011011100010000001110011011101000110000101101110011001000010000001100101011110000111010001110010011001010110110101100101011100110010000001101111011001100010000001100101011011100111011001101001011100100110111101101110011011010110010101101110011101000010000001100101011000010111001101101001011011000111100100101110001000000101010001101000011001010111001101100101001000000110000101110010011001010010000001100110011000010110001101110100011100110010000001110111011010000110100101100011011010000010110000100000011101110110100101110100011010000010000001110100011010000110010100100000011100110110010101101100011001100010110101100101011101100110100101100100011001010110111001110100001000000111000001110010011011110111000001101111011100110110100101110100011010010110111101101110001000000111010001101000011000010111010000100000011011100110111100100000011000100110010101101001011011100110011100100000011000110110000101101110001000000110001101110010011001010110000101110100011001010010000001100001011011100110111101110100011010000110010101110010001000000110001001100101011010010110111001100111001000000111001101110101011100000110010101110010011010010110111101110010001000000111010001101111001000000110100101110100011100110110010101101100011001100010110000100000011100110110110101100001011100110110100001100101011100110010000001111001011011110111010101110010001000000111001101101001011011000110110001111001001000000110100001111001011100000110111101110100011010000110010101110011011010010111001100100000011101000110111100100000011011100110111101110100011010000110100101101110011001110010111010010100001000000000110100001010001001100010001100111000001100100011000100110011001110110010000001001001011100110110000101100001011000110010000001000001011100110110100101101101011011110111011000101100001000000100100100101100001000000101001001101111011000100110111101110100

Use this to read the text : 

Binary To Text Conversion

0100010101101110011010100110111101111001

© 2013 MU-Peter Shimon

Why Shouldn't I Work for the NSA?

Why Shouldn't I Work for the NSA?

The purpose of government is to protect
the secrecy and the privacy of all individuals,
not the secrecy of government.
Ron Paul

Why Shouldn't I Work for the NSA - Good Will Hunting 1997 Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power.  Ben Franklin

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin Full Speech ~ 20 minutes Interview with Ex-NSA Senior Executive Ron Paul in 1984 So Orwell's 1984 was on time after all Ron Paul on the NSA today This will be the best security for maintaining our liberties. A nation of well-informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. Benjamin Franklin JFK, MLK jr, & Ron Paul

John F. Kennedy Speech April 1961 Abridged ~ 5 minutes The text transcript is from the  JOHN F. KENNEDY PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM "The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.  For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."  "No President should fear public scrutinity of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed. I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers-- I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them. Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion. This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security... "And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."

No Such Agency Now Spying Americans

God grant, that not only the Love of Liberty, but a thorough Knowledge of the Rights of Man

may pervade all the Nations of the Earth, so that a Philosopher may set his Foot anywhere on its Surface,
and say, “This is my Country.”

 Benjamin Franklin

Enjoy

© 2013 MU-Peter Shimon

It's Your LIFE!

It's Your LIFE!

Alan Watts - Life Has A Voice

1

Enjoy
20013 MU-Peter Shimon

The Median Isn't The Message

The Median Isn't The Message (or Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics)

“Many people make an unfortunate and invalid separation between heart and mind, or feeling and intellect. In some contemporary traditions, abetted by attitudes stereotypically centered on Southern California, feelings are exalted as more “real” and the only proper basis for action – if it feels good, do it – while intellect gets short shrift as a hang-up of outmoded elitism. Statistics, in this absurd dichotomy, often become the symbol of the enemy.” Stephen Jay Gould

Video version of The Median Isn't The Message (The voice over is not Dr. Gould)

"Variation itself is nature's only irreducible essence. Variation is the hard reality, not a set of imperfect measures for a central tendency"

The Median Isn't the Message by Stephen Jay Gould In 1982, I learned I was suffering from a rare and serious cancer. After surgery, I asked my doctor what the best technical literature on the cancer was. She told me, with a touch of diplomacy, that there was nothing really worth reading. I soon realized why she had offered that humane advice: my cancer is incurable, with a median mortality of eight months after discovery. The problem may be briefly stated: What does "median mortality of eight months" signify in our vernacular? I suspect that most people, without training in statistics, would read such a statement as "I will probably be dead in eight months" the very conclusion that must be avoided, since it isn't so.

My life has recently intersected, in a most personal way, two of Mark Twain's famous quips. One I shall defer to the end of this essay. The other (sometimes attributed to Disraeli), identifies three species of mendacity, each worse than the one before -  lies, damned lies, and statistics. Consider the standard example of stretching the truth with numbers - a case quite relevant to my story. Statistics recognizes different measures of an "average," or central tendency. The mean is our usual concept of an overall average - add up the items and divide them by the number of sharers (100 candy bars collected for five kids next Halloween will yield 20 for each in a just world). The median, a different measure of central tendency, is the half-way point. If I line up five kids by height, the median child is shorter than two and taller than the other two (who might have trouble getting their mean share of the candy). A politician in power might say with pride, "The mean income of our citizens is $15,000 per year." The leader of the opposition might retort, "But half our citizens make less than $10,000 per year." Both are right, but neither cites a statistic with impassive objectivity. The first invokes a mean, the second a median. (Means are higher than medians in such cases because one millionaire may outweigh hundreds of poor people in setting a mean; but he can balance only one mendicant in calculating a median).

The larger issue that creates a common distrust or contempt for statistics is more troubling. Many people make an unfortunate and invalid separation between heart and mind, or feeling and intellect. In some contemporary traditions, abetted by attitudes stereotypically centered on Southern California, feelings are exalted as more "real" and the only proper basis for action - if it feels good, do it - while intellect gets short shrift as a hang-up of outmoded elitism. Statistics, in this absurd dichotomy, often become the symbol of the enemy. As Hilaire Belloc wrote, "Statistics are the triumph of the quantitative method, and the quantitative method is the victory of sterility and death." This is a personal story of statistics, properly interpreted, as profoundly nurturant and life-giving. It declares holy war on the downgrading of intellect by telling a small story about the utility of dry, academic knowledge about science. Heart and head are focal points of one body, one personality.

In July 1982, I learned that I was suffering from abdominal mesothelioma, a rare and serious cancer usually associated with exposure to asbestos. When I revived after surgery, I asked my first question of my doctor and chemotherapist: "What is the best technical literature about mesothelioma?" She replied, with a touch of diplomacy (the only departure she has ever made from direct frankness), that the medical literature contained nothing really worth reading. Of course, trying to keep an intellectual away from literature works about as well as recommending chastity to Homo sapiens, the sexiest primate of all. As soon as I could walk, I made a beeline for Harvard's Countway medical library and punched mesothelioma into the computer's bibliographic search program. An hour later, surrounded by the latest literature on abdominal mesothelioma, I realized with a gulp why my doctor had offered that humane advice. The literature couldn't have been more brutally clear: mesothelioma is incurable, with a median mortality of only eight months after discovery. I sat stunned for about fifteen minutes, then smiled and said to myself: so that's why they didn't give me anything to read. Then my mind started to work again, thank goodness. If a little learning could ever be a dangerous thing, I had encountered a classic example. Attitude clearly matters in fighting cancer. We don't know why (from my old-style materialistic perspective, I suspect that mental states feed back upon the immune system). But match people with the same cancer for age, class, health, socioeconomic status, and, in general, those with positive attitudes, with a strong will and purpose for living, with commitment to struggle, with an active response to aiding their own treatment and not just a passive acceptance of anything doctors say, tend to live longer. A few months later I asked Sir Peter Medawar, my personal scientific guru and a Nobelist in immunology, what the best prescription for success against cancer might be. "A sanguine personality," he replied. Fortunately (since one can't reconstruct oneself at short notice and for a definite purpose), I am, if anything, even-tempered and confident in just this manner.

Hence the dilemma for humane doctors: since attitude matters so critically, should such a sombre conclusion be advertised, especially since few people have sufficient understanding of statistics to evaluate what the statements really mean? From years of experience with the small-scale evolution of Bahamian land snails treated quantitatively, I have developed this technical knowledge - and I am convinced that it played a major role in saving my life. Knowledge is indeed power, in Bacon's proverb. The problem may be briefly stated: What does "median mortality of eight months" signify in our vernacular? I suspect that most people, without training in statistics, would read such a statement as "I will probably be dead in eight months" - the very conclusion that must be avoided, since it isn't so, and since attitude matters so much. I was not, of course, overjoyed, but I didn't read the statement in this vernacular way either. My technical training enjoined a different perspective on "eight months median mortality." The point is a subtle one, but profound - for it embodies the distinctive way of thinking in my own field of evolutionary biology and natural history. We still carry the historical baggage of a Platonic heritage that seeks sharp essences and definite boundaries. (Thus we hope to find an unambiguous "beginning of life" or "definition of death," although nature often comes to us as irreducible continua.) This Platonic heritage, with its emphasis in clear distinctions and separated immutable entities, leads us to view statistical measures of central tendency wrongly, indeed opposite to the appropriate interpretation in our actual world of variation, shadings, and continua. In short, we view means and medians as the hard "realities," and the variation that permits their calculation as a set of transient and imperfect measurements of this hidden essence. If the median is the reality and variation around the median just a device for its calculation, the "I will probably be dead in eight months" may pass as a reasonable interpretation.

But all evolutionary biologists know that variation itself is nature's only irreducible essence. Variation is the hard reality, not a set of imperfect measures for a central tendency. Means and medians are the abstractions. Therefore, I looked at the mesothelioma statistics quite differently - and not only because I am an optimist who tends to see the doughnut instead of the hole, but primarily because I know that variation itself is the reality. I had to place myself amidst the variation. When I learned about the eight-month median, my first intellectual reaction was: fine, half the people will live longer; now what are my chances of being in that half. I read for a furious and nervous hour and concluded, with relief: damned good. I possessed every one of the characteristics conferring a probability of longer life: I was young; my disease had been recognized in a relatively early stage; I would receive the nation's best medical treatment; I had the world to live for; I knew how to read the data properly and not despair. Another technical point then added even more solace. I immediately recognized that the distribution of variation about the eight-month median would almost surely be what statisticians call "right skewed." (In a symmetrical distribution, the profile of variation to the left of the central tendency is a mirror image of variation to the right. In skewed distributions, variation to one side of the central tendency is more stretched out - left skewed if extended to the left, right skewed if stretched out to the right.) The distribution of variation had to be right skewed, I reasoned. After all, the left of the distribution contains an irrevocable lower boundary of zero (since mesothelioma can only be identified at death or before). Thus, there isn't much room for the distribution's lower (or left) half - it must be scrunched up between zero and eight months. But the upper (or right) half can extend out for years and years, even if nobody ultimately survives. The distribution must be right skewed, and I needed to know how long the extended tail ran - for I had already concluded that my favorable profile made me a good candidate for that part of the curve. The distribution was indeed, strongly right skewed, with a long tail (however small) that extended for several years above the eight month median. I saw no reason why I shouldn't be in that small tail, and I breathed a very long sigh of relief. My technical knowledge had helped. I had read the graph correctly. I had asked the right question and found the answers. I had obtained, in all probability, the most precious of all possible gifts in the circumstances - substantial time. I didn't have to stop and immediately follow Isaiah's injunction to Hezekiah - set thine house in order for thou shalt die, and not live. I would have time to think, to plan, and to fight.

One final point about statistical distributions. They apply only to a prescribed set of circumstances - in this case to survival with mesothelioma under conventional modes of treatment. If circumstances change, the distribution may alter. I was placed on an experimental protocol of treatment and, if fortune holds, will be in the first cohort of a new distribution with high median and a right tail extending to death by natural causes at advanced old age. It has become, in my view, a bit too trendy to regard the acceptance of death as something tantamount to intrinsic dignity. Of course I agree with the preacher of Ecclesiastes that there is a time to love and a time to die - and when my skein runs out I hope to face the end calmly and in my own way. For most situations, however, I prefer the more martial view that death is the ultimate enemy - and I find nothing reproachable in those who rage mightily against the dying of the light.

See also:  Marihuana,  The Forbidden Medicine by Stephen Jay Gould

The swords of battle are numerous, and none more effective than humor. My death was announced at a meeting of my colleagues in Scotland, and I almost experienced the delicious pleasure of reading my obituary penned by one of my best friends (the so-and-so got suspicious and checked; he too is a statistician, and didn't expect to find me so far out on the right tail). Still, the incident provided my first good laugh after the diagnosis. Just think, I almost got to repeat Mark Twain's most famous line of all: the reports of my death are greatly exaggerated. Stephen Jay Gould

Dr. Gould died in 2002 at the age of 60, 20 years after his diagnosis ...but not from abdominal mesothelioma.

Enjoy

© 2013 MU-Peter Shimon